Skip to main content

Effects on Banning Short Selling

If the SEC temporarily bans short selling, it will actually INCREASE the cost to banks of raising new capital, and the market's floor might be removed.

- "The Securities and Exchange Commission took its most aggressive assault against bearish stock bets by stating its intention to issue a temporary ban on short-selling," writes the WSJ. "SEC Chairman Christopher Cox briefed Congress late Thursday of the agency's intention to take the extraordinary step of interfering with the market's regular functioning."

- This move will affect hedge funds that use short positions to hedge investment risk during a rights issue or placing. If they're not able to provide liquidity during a rights issue, the costs to banks of raising new capital will increase. 

- Shorts provide a floor, buying (i.e. covering shorts) when there is no one left to buy. If you can't short, the only way to reduce your risk is to sell, which may exaggerate downside pressure in the event of a market sell-off. A simple illustration: Look at China's stock market, where no short selling is allowed. The Shanghai composite went from 6100+ to 1800 in the space of a few months...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Asian Comic: During bad times

Nice Asian styled comics    

Long 50,000 AUD/USD at 0.7903 and GBP/USD at 1.7681

Hi guys, For your info, I am long 50,000 AUD/USD at 0.7903, as well as 50,000 GBP/USD at 1.7681. The stop level for both position will be 100 pips away from entry price. Existing long position of 15,000 GBP/JPY, remains open at 189.49.    Will be looking forward to reduce my position before tomorrow's voting with the congress, and the NFP announcement.  Good trades to all. 

Think That Central Banks Move the Markets? Think Again

April 23, 2009 By Mark Galasiewski The following is excerpted from Elliott Wave International’s Global Market Perspective. The full 120-page publication, which features forecasts for every major world market, is available free until April 30. Visit Elliott Wave International to download it free . Conventional wisdom says that central banks can influence or even direct financial markets and the macroeconomy. The very existence of Elliott waves challenges such assumptions. For if markets responded to every central bank directive, how could Elliott waves exist? Parallel trend channels, Fibonacci price relationships, the similarity of form between waves of different sizes and time periods—none of that would be possible. Central bank decisions would have to coincide perfectly with turning points in Elliott waves, and we know that just doesn’t happen. But even without using waves, we can expose the conventional wisdom for the fallacy that it is. Take, for example, this assertion in ...